<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<metadata>
  <identifier>101588524.nlm.nih.gov</identifier>
  <contributor>U.S. National Library of Medicine</contributor>
  <mediatype>texts</mediatype>
  <ppi>400</ppi>
  <sponsor>Open Knowledge Commons, U.S. National Library of Medicine</sponsor>
  <collection>usnationallibraryofmedicine</collection>
  <collection>medicineintheamericas</collection>
  <collection>medicalheritagelibrary</collection>
  <collection>americana</collection>
  <publicdate>2015-01-29 17:08:04</publicdate>
  <title>Explanations : a sequel to "Vestiges of the natural history of creation"</title>
  <uploader>NLMInternetArchiveAdministrators@mail.nih.gov</uploader>
  <addeddate>2015-01-29 17:08:04</addeddate>
  <creator>Chambers, Robert, 1802-1871</creator>
  <publisher>New York : Wiley &amp; Putnam</publisher>
  <date>1846</date>
  <subject>Biological Evolution</subject>
  <language>eng</language>
  <description>Includes bibliographical references</description>
  <description>Design of the Vestiges explained -- Proper position of the nebular hypothesis in the argument -- Imputed failure of the hypothesis from the Earl of Rosse's discoveries, denied -- Experiments illustrating and confirming the hypothesis by Professor Plateau -- Objection from the retrogression of Uranus's satellites considered -- Objection respecting the convergence of atoms to a central nucleus, answered -- The nebular hypothesis not a supersession of deity, but only a description of his mode of working -- Quetelet's inquiries, establishing law in mental operations -- Limits of the system being under law, the whole is probably so -- Question of the origin of organic nature -- Geology proves it to have observed a progress in time -- Objections respecting this progress -- Lower Silurian fossils -- Upper Silurian fossils -- Old red sandstone -- Carboniferous system -- Permian system -- Outline of the genetic plan of the animal kingdom -- Bearing of this plan on the arguments of objectors -- Reptiles of the Muschelkalk, Lias -- Objections as to first footmarks of birds -- Objections as to earliest mammalia -- Tertiary formation -- Opinions of Cuvier and Agassiz -- Apology of Mr. Sedgwick for over-ardent generalizations -- Physiological objections of Dr. Clark, of Cambridge -- Views of others respecting embryotic development -- Germs not alleged to be identical -- Transmutation of plants -- Species a term, not a fact -- Instances of transmutation -- Transmutation does not imply extinction of elder species -- The Broomfield experiment -- Proof of aboriginal life in the present era not essential to the theory of organic creation by law -- The opposite theory characterized -- Views of Dr. Whewell, and objections to them -- Views of the Edinburgh Reviewer : these analyzed -- Views of Professor Agassiz -- Views of Sir John Herschel -- Support to theory of law from Rev. Dr. Pye Smith and Blackwood's magazine -- Mr. Stuart Mill on universal causation -- Present state of opinion on the origin of organic nature examined -- Animals have not come immediately on the occurence of proper conditions -- Great number of distinct floras -- Supposed formation of new species, as upheld by Professor Owen, &amp;c., inadmissible -- Opinions of Professor Pictet on peculiarity of species in each formation -- Time the true key to difficulties arising from apparent permanency of species -- Vast spaces of time involved in the geological record -- Zoology of Galapagos Islands, an instance of comparatively recent development -- Author's theory supported by facts connected with the distribution of plants -- Whence the first impulse to vitality? -- The Vestiges : its object purely scientific : defended on this ground -- Ungenerous policy of geological objectors -- Opposition of the scientific class -- Estimate of this opposition -- Utility of hypotheses -- Bearing of the new doctrine on human interests -- Its moral results -- Consolations and encouragements offered by it -- Appendix : letters of Mr. Weeks on aboriginal production of insects</description>
  <description>US Navy Bureau of Medicine &amp; Surgery's Office of Medical History;</description>
  <description>Condition reviewed</description>
  <description>digitized</description>
  <identifier-access>http://archive.org/details/101588524.nlm.nih.gov</identifier-access>
  <identifier-ark>ark:/13960/t1kh3sr4z</identifier-ark>
  <repub_state>4</repub_state>
  <backup_location>ia905300_15</backup_location>
  <ocr_module_version>0.0.21</ocr_module_version>
  <ocr_converted>abbyy-to-hocr 1.1.37</ocr_converted>
  <page_number_confidence>88</page_number_confidence>
  <page_number_module_version>1.0.5</page_number_module_version>
  <pdf_module_version>0.0.23</pdf_module_version>
  <collection>medicallibrary</collection>
  <collection_added>medicallibrary</collection_added>
</metadata>
